Well let's just name the spec something else from the protocol version and focus on what's important here which is finalizing the draft so we can begin applying the updating to libraries.
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 3:44 PM, Jonathan Sergent <serg...@google.com> wrote: > Let me additionally say that this discussion is dangerous and voting is no > way to design a protocol. What are the arguments in favor of changing the > version number, and what are the arguments against changing it? I haven't > personally seen any arguments in favor of changing it that explained the > rationale other than "of course you should change it because you changed the > version number on the spec". > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OAuth" group. To post to this group, send email to oauth@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to oauth+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/oauth?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
