I think we can clearly label the document so that people will not be confused about which specification they need to use. As long as we don't use '1.1' in the title of the specification, we will not confuse anyone.
EHL From: oauth@googlegroups.com [mailto:oa...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Josh Roesslein Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 1:13 PM To: oauth@googlegroups.com Subject: [oauth] Re: Version Preference Here's a quick count of the votes: Option 1: 8 Option 3: 12 Eran has made some good points in another thread. In this revision we can auto detect which from we are using, but in the future this might not be true. So do we create different versions? Wire version - only incremented if we can't auto detect the changes in the updated spec (example: signature changes) Document version - incremented with each revision to the document. (example 1.0 Rev A, 2009.1, etc) To me this adds some complexity and might confuse people we use two different versions. This is why I am leaning towards making them the same and incrementing the version. SP's can still support 1.0 wire versions just fine so we won't be breaking anything. I would just like a consistent increment pattern for this version. When we can auto detect we just ignore this version. If we can't auto detect we look at this value. Well that's my two cents on this topic. On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 1:23 PM, J. Trent Adams <jtrentad...@gmail.com<mailto:jtrentad...@gmail.com>> wrote: +1 for Option 3. "Version 1.1" Blaine Cook wrote: > We need to build some consensus around the version preference. As I > see it, there are several options: > > 1. "1.0 Rev A" with no version string change (i.e., oauth_version=1.0) > 2. "1.0a" (with oauth_version=1.0a) > 3. "1.1" > > Please indicate your support for one of these options, and try to > refrain from arguing your case here. The other thread remains open for > that purpose. I would especially like to hear from library > implementers here, and others who have not voiced their opinions in > the other threads. > > b. > > > > -- J. Trent Adams =jtrentadams Profile: http://www.mediaslate.org/jtrentadams/ LinkedIN: http://www.linkedin.com/in/jtrentadams Twitter: http://twitter.com/jtrentadams --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OAuth" group. To post to this group, send email to oauth@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to oauth+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/oauth?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
