On 9/13/10 8:24 PM, Thomas Hardjono wrote: > Hannes, > > I strongly believe that SAML support in Outh2.0 and "SAML-interoperability" > is crucial in getting Oauth accepted and deployed in high-assurance > (high-value) environments (eg. government, financials). +1. > As such, if its ok with Brian, I would be willing to either co-author or > review the SAML-related drafts.
Would review. > > ps. Apologies for stating the obvious, but I think the new charter/recharter > should define clearly what is expected as deliverable(s) from the OAUTH WG in > regards to SAML support. +1 _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
