Could we have some discussion on the interop cases? Is it driven by scenarios where AS and resource are separate domains? Or may this be only of interest to specific protocols like UMA?
From a technique principle, the draft is important and sound. I am just not there yet on the reasons for an interoperable standard. Phil > On Jul 28, 2014, at 17:00, Thomas Broyer <t.bro...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Yes. This spec is of special interest to the platform we're building for > http://www.oasis-eu.org/ > > >> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 7:33 PM, Hannes Tschofenig >> <hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net> wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> during the IETF #90 OAuth WG meeting, there was strong consensus in >> adopting the "OAuth Token Introspection" >> (draft-richer-oauth-introspection-06.txt) specification as an OAuth WG >> work item. >> >> We would now like to verify the outcome of this call for adoption on the >> OAuth WG mailing list. Here is the link to the document: >> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-richer-oauth-introspection/ >> >> If you did not hum at the IETF 90 OAuth WG meeting, and have an opinion >> as to the suitability of adopting this document as a WG work item, >> please send mail to the OAuth WG list indicating your opinion (Yes/No). >> >> The confirmation call for adoption will last until August 10, 2014. If >> you have issues/edits/comments on the document, please send these >> comments along to the list in your response to this Call for Adoption. >> >> Ciao >> Hannes & Derek >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OAuth mailing list >> OAuth@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth > > > > -- > Thomas Broyer > /tɔ.ma.bʁwa.je/ > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > OAuth@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
