In my opinion, at this time, the OAuth WG should not proceed with the symmetric implementation of PoP and should not continue work on HTTP signing.
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 12:45 PM, Hannes Tschofenig < hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net> wrote: > Hi all, > > two questions surfaced at the last IETF meeting, namely > > 1) Do we want to proceed with the symmetric implementation of PoP or, > alternatively, do we want to move it over to the ACE working group? > > 2) Do we want to continue the work on HTTP signing? > > We would appreciate your input on these two questions. > > Ciao > Hannes & Derek > > > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > OAuth@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth > >
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
