I support adoption by the WG On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 8:51 AM Mike Jones <Michael.Jones= 40microsoft....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> Given that the draft is now being used, I support working group adoption. > > > > I’d also like to request time in Yokohama to talk about the draft. > > > > Thanks, > > -- Mike > > > > *From:* OAuth <oauth-boun...@ietf.org> *On Behalf Of * Giuseppe De Marco > *Sent:* Tuesday, January 24, 2023 1:38 AM > *To:* oauth <oauth@ietf.org> > *Cc:* flo...@agid.gov.it; michele.dam...@agid.gov.it; cole...@agid.gov.it; > nunzio.napolit...@agid.gov.it; fa.mar...@ipzs.it; > michela.c...@teamdigitale.governo.it > *Subject:* [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 2.0 Protected Resource Metadata > > > > Hello everybody, > > I would like to bring to your attention this expired draft: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-jones-oauth-resource-metadata/ > > I propose the take up this individual draft for its adoption as an > official internet draft. > The reason I ask this is that there are implementations of this draft born > with the need to have metadata for entities of type RS. > > The implementation of which I am aware concerns the Italian "Attribute > Authorities" [0]. OpenID Federation draft also defines the metadata of the > oauth_resource type [1], taking up the elements defined in the draft in > question. Recently, an interesting reflection seems to have arisen also in > OpenID4VCI/OpenID4VP [2]. > > Thank you for your attention, I hope to read your valuable feedback soon, > > best > > > > [0] https://italia.github.io/spid-cie-oidc-docs/en/metadata_aa.html > > [1] > https://openid.net/specs/openid-connect-federation-1_0.html#section-4.7 > > [2] > https://bitbucket.org/openid/connect/issues/1781/do-new-entity-types-required-for-oid4vp > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > OAuth@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth >
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
