I added both to the list of topics to discuss in Yokohama. Let's have that discussion first, before calling for any adoption.
Regards, Rifaat & Hannes On Sat, Jan 28, 2023 at 8:35 PM Aaron Parecki <aaron= 40parecki....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > There is significant overlap between this draft and the concepts brought > to the OAuth WG at the last IETF meeting by Ben Schwartz, which he also > presented to the HTTPAPI WG. After that meeting, I volunteered to work with > Ben on adapting his concepts to a model that would fit better within the > OAuth framework. I published an early draft, which I am planning on > presenting at the next IETF meeting. > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-parecki-oauth-authorization-server-discovery/ > > During the HTTPAPI and OAuth sessions at IETF 115, there were many > concerns expressed by various people in the groups about establishing and > enabling this kind of relationship, which would also apply to this Resource > Metadata draft. I believe there should be further discussions about the > concepts described here as well as how best to enable other working groups > to take advantage of this kind of relationship between an RS and AS before > adopting this particular draft. > > Aaron > > > > On Sat, Jan 28, 2023 at 5:21 PM David Waite <david= > 40alkaline-solutions....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > >> I support adoption by the working group. >> >> -DW >> >> On Jan 24, 2023, at 2:38 AM, Giuseppe De Marco <demarco...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> Hello everybody, >> >> I would like to bring to your attention this expired draft: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-jones-oauth-resource-metadata/ >> >> I propose the take up this individual draft for its adoption as an >> official internet draft. >> The reason I ask this is that there are implementations of this draft >> born with the need to have metadata for entities of type RS. >> >> The implementation of which I am aware concerns the Italian "Attribute >> Authorities" [0]. OpenID Federation draft also defines the metadata of the >> oauth_resource type [1], taking up the elements defined in the draft in >> question. Recently, an interesting reflection seems to have arisen also in >> OpenID4VCI/OpenID4VP [2]. >> >> Thank you for your attention, I hope to read your valuable feedback soon, >> best >> >> [0] https://italia.github.io/spid-cie-oidc-docs/en/metadata_aa.html >> [1] >> https://openid.net/specs/openid-connect-federation-1_0.html#section-4.7 >> [2] >> https://bitbucket.org/openid/connect/issues/1781/do-new-entity-types-required-for-oid4vp >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OAuth mailing list >> OAuth@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OAuth mailing list >> OAuth@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth >> > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > OAuth@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth >
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
