+1 for the adoption so we can explore this as a WG document
+1 to Brian's comment to consider the application to tokens in general (unless the authors have plans for JWT / CWT specific features)
Vladimir Dzhuvinov On 03/10/2023 00:10, Brian Campbell wrote:
I support adoption.I do think the document would be more appropriately scoped with more focus on the status list itself and less so on the JWT/CWT signed representations thereof. As such, I'd suggest maybe using a less specific docname without the jwt-cwt bit if/when it moves to a WG draft. Something like draft-ietf-oauth-token-status-list.On Sat, Sep 30, 2023 at 6:53 AM Rifaat Shekh-Yusef <rifaat.s.i...@gmail.com> wrote:All, This is an official call for adoption for the *JWT and CWT Status List* draft: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-looker-oauth-jwt-cwt-status-list/ Please, reply *on the mailing list *and let us know if you are in *favor *or*against *adopting this draft as WG document, by *Oct 13th*. Regards, Rifaat & Hannes _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth/CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any file attachments from your computer. Thank you./_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
