On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 11:11:36PM +0000, Peter Tribble wrote:
>
> (When we ratified sysadmin recently, we basically followed the new
> community inititiation procedure, so just need 3 members to nominate
> the initial list of core contributors.)
Sounds like a plan.
> > While certain observability projects (DTrace, MDB, etc) are large enough
> > to warrant a community of their own, I don't think the entirety of the
> > observability community is subsumed by other communities on OpenSolaris.
> > For example, we currently sponsor the jkstat and network MIB projects.
> > So personally I would like to see it continue, and we should set up the
> > appropriate infrastructure (core contributors, facilitator, etc) to do
> > so. That being said, the webpages could use a little TLC from someone
> > with some free time on their hands.
> >
> > The current website leaders are:
> >
> > bmc (Bryan M. Cantrill)
> > mws (Mike Shapiro)
> > dp (Daniel B. Price)
> > tomee (Tom Erickson)
> > rab (Russell Blaine)
> > barts (Bart Smaalders)
> > eschrock (Eric Schrock)
> > ahl (Adam H. Leventhal)
> > ptribble (Peter Tribble)
> >
> > Certainly all these people are worthy of being core contributors, but
> > I'd also be happy to reduce that set if we'd prefer to have a finer set
> > of criteria between core contributors and contributors.
>
> I would suggest also Alexander Kolbasov, Chad Mynhier, and Brendan
> Gregg are worthy of consideration.
>
> I'm not sure all the above are active in the observability community (as
> opposed to, say, the dtrace community).
Yes, I agree. Judging from people whom have be active in the
observability community, and/or actively putting back to non-DTrace,
non-MDB tools, I would suggest the following breakdown:
Core Contributors
Alexander Kolbasov
Eric Schrock
Peter Tribble
Contributors
Russell Blaine
Bryan Cantrill
Tom Erickson
Brendan Gregg
Adam Leventhal
Chad Mynhier
Dan Price
Mike Shapiro
Bart Smaalders
Since all these folks have core contributor grants elsewhere, I don't
think we need to go crazy with core contributor grants for the sake of
voting rights. That being said, many of the above folks have been much
more involved in the observability tools in the past, and are just
currently doing other projects.
> > And does anyone want to step up to be the facilitator for the community?
>
> I would be happy to take that on if asked.
That would be great.
--
Eric Schrock, FishWorks http://blogs.sun.com/eschrock