Hello Mr. Salaices, > 1.- Are some/all of these issues resolved ?,
Some of them are solved in 1.6 and some are bogus, like the issue 4 -- the OCFS2 does not officially support SAMBA shares, so reporting problems with it is pointless. > 2.- If your Job depended on it would you use OCFS2 Now , using the > same version/release My Job depends on it and we have two clusters deployed in production and are planning the third. They are small, but with heavy IO load, mainly e-mail. Cluster 1 (running since 01/2008): OCFS2 1.4.4 two nodes SuSE Enterprise 10SP3 Storage: Dell/EMC AX-100 - fibre channel - 800 GiB volume Will be upgraded to CentOS 5.5 with OCFS 1.6.3 Cluster 2 (running since 11/2010): OCFS2 1.6.3 two node (two more underway) CentOS 5.5 + Unbreakable Kernel Storage: Dell EqualLogic VX4000 - iSCSI - 3.6 TiB volume Cluster 3 (planned): OCFS2 1.6.x four node CentOS 5.5 + Unbreakable Kernel Storage: Unknown - iSCSI - unknown size > 3.- Can we expect to see Release 1.6 without these bugs to be > available @ > http://oss.oracle.com/projects/ocfs2/files/RedHat/RHEL5/x86_64/ Soon. OCFS2 1.6 fixes a lot of bugs, including the "filesystem full" problem. Take a look at the user guide: http://oss.oracle.com/projects/ocfs2/dist/documentation/v1.6/ocfs2-1_6-usersguide.pdf > 4.- if 1.6 Is available in RPM form, stable and downloadable .. Where > is it ? Yes, it is. You can download it from the public yum repository: http://public-yum.oracle.com/ but I can't tell for sure if it works on RHEL 5.3, because the kernel is available for RHEL/OL/CentOS 5.5, 5.6 and 6.0. Regards, -- .:''''':. .:' ` Sérgio Surkamp | Gerente de Rede :: ........ ser...@gruposinternet.com.br `:. .:' `:, ,.:' *Grupos Internet S.A.* `: :' R. Lauro Linhares, 2123 Torre B - Sala 201 : : Trindade - Florianópolis - SC :.' :: +55 48 3234-4109 : ' http://www.gruposinternet.com.br _______________________________________________ Ocfs2-users mailing list Ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com http://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-users