Am Dienstag, den 02.12.2008, 23:01 +0100 schrieb Søren Hauberg:
> tir, 02 12 2008 kl. 22:54 +0100, skrev Thomas Weber:
> > Yes, but it's possible to compile Octave without sparse support. So
> > arpack is relying on a feature that might not be there. Or is
> > suitesparse now mandatory in Octave? Then my argument is obviously
> > void.
>
> Isn't the relevant question if the binary distributed by Debian is
> compiled against suitesparse? I mean, if the binary version of Octave
> that ships with Debian (and hence Ubuntu) depends on suitesparse, then I
> would assume that the octave-headers package would depend on the
> suitesparse headers.
For someone who uses a binary distribution, yes. But what if I compile
it myself without sparse support (incidentally, I have such a stripped
down version of Octave running on tw-math.de, the reason is space)?
Thomas
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Octave-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev
