Søren Hauberg wrote: > > ons, 03 12 2008 kl. 13:57 +0800, skrev LUK ShunTim: > > IIRC, I recently read somewhere that licensing problem of arpack has > > been resolved so it may be back in "main" again. > > Do you have a reference for this?
http://www.caam.rice.edu/software/ARPACK/RiceBSD.txt Looks definitive to me. Whether or not Debian agrees -- and I can't see why they wouldn't -- a standard 3-clause BSD license is certainly compatible with Octave's licensing. There's no legal reason not to bundle arpack with Octave. HTH. --jkl ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Octave-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev
