On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 1:31 PM, Søren Hauberg <[email protected]> wrote: > Based on this discussion, we are now using option 1. (but if there are > doubts I'll change it back, just to be certain)
My doubt was whether you were being asked to additionally assert compliance with any additional US export restrictions. From what you posted it looks like you are only asked whether encryption is present. I'm pretty confident #1 is correct. --judd FYI some PHP people seem to be freaking out about md5() and sha1() being encryption and spreading a bunch of FUD on the blogosphere. They don't know what they are talking about. You can't decrypt a hash without brute-forcing the keyspace. Hashes are one-way. That's why they're used for passwords and data integrity. When you login the hash of the password you enter is computed and compared to a stored hash. If you have only the hash it's nearly impossible to figure out which password will produces that particular hash. You can't use a hash to transmit information is what I'm saying. The recipient either already knows the password or is going to spend the next 150 years trying to figure out what it could be. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Octave-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev
