On 13 May 2010, at 23:00, Lukas Reichlin wrote: >> Certainly. But at this event, only Windows machines were available >> and >> Matlab was already pre-installed. I had little options >> about the setup. (and i do not want to say it loud, but M is still >> faster, [1]. Admittingly, Octave has improved since 2006, and I see >> only >> difference by a factor of 2-3 instead of 4-5). >> >> [1] http://arxiv.org/abs/cs/0603001v1
Do you still have the code to run those benchmarks at hand? It would be very interesting to compare how the speed of Octave changed between version 2.9.4 and 3.3, for a fair comparison you would need to run the tests on the same hardware though.. c. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Octave-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev
