On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 11:11 AM, Judd Storrs <[email protected]> wrote: > I think the opposition is that your proposing rewriting octave code > for the sole purpose of compatibility with a translator that targets > octave.
I meant "targets Matlab". Oops. --judd ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Octave-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev
