Judd Storrs wrote: > On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 3:38 PM, Alois Schlögl <[email protected]> > wrote: >> - while ninner++ < maxinner >> + while ninner < maxinner >> + ninner = ninner + 1; > > If this is a problem that oct2mat cannot handle, possibly the octave > language is just ill-suited to simple awk-based transformations? > > If we stick strictly to m-files and ignore dependencies on oct-files, > perhaps the best approach is to use the octave parser itself to read > the files, make whatever transformations are necessary, and then write > them back out? An octave->matlab converter should be a good first step > someone could build on to implement an octave compiler. > > > --judd
Technically, having a sophisticated parser would be an improvement over an awk-based transformation. However, if there is no agreement that having "free toolboxes for matlab" is a worthwhile goal, it would expect similar opposition than trying to make the source code compatible. The latter would be much easier to realize than using a parser, I think. -- Alois ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Octave-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev
