Hi Aki,
> This interface exposes a rw property for radio access selection mode
> setting.
> ---
> Makefile.am | 6 +-
> doc/radio-settings-api.txt | 42 +++++
> include/radio-settings.h | 74 +++++++++
> src/ofono.h | 2 +
> src/radio-settings.c | 372
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 5 files changed, 494
> insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 doc/radio-settings-api.txt
> create mode 100644 include/radio-settings.h
> create mode 100644 src/radio-settings.c
<snip>
> +Properties string Mode [read-write]
Per mailing list thread with Marcel, "Technology" or "TechnologySelection" or
"TechnologyPreference" will be better here.
> +
> + The current radio access selection mode, also known
> + as network preference.
> +
> + The possible values are:
> + "dual" Radio access selection is done
> + automatically, using either 2G
> + or 3G, depending on reception.
As discussed in later threads, I do like "auto" or "any" here.
> + "2g" Only GSM used for radio access.
> + "3g" Only UTRAN used for radio access.
> + "unknown" Mode currently unknown.
Lets get rid of the "unknown" part, we always know the setting, even if it
takes a little time to query it.
> diff --git a/include/radio-settings.h b/include/radio-settings.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..807d3da
> +typedef void (*ofono_radio_settings_mode_query_cb_t)(const struct
> ofono_error *error, + enum
> ofono_radio_access_mode mode,
> + void *data);
I still say this part is not required.
> +
> +struct ofono_radio_settings_driver {
> + const char *name;
> + int (*probe)(struct ofono_radio_settings *rs, unsigned int vendor, void
> *data); + void (*remove)(struct ofono_radio_settings *rs);
> + void (*query_mode)(struct ofono_radio_settings *rs,
> + ofono_radio_settings_mode_query_cb_t cb, void
> *data);
Neither is query_mode. This is a local modem setting, not a network setting.
There's simply no reason to query it when oFono can store the settings.
Lets just add ability to read the mode setting from storage and set it at
interface startup.
> + void (*set_mode)(struct ofono_radio_settings *rs,
> + enum ofono_radio_access_mode mode,
> + ofono_radio_settings_mode_set_cb_t cb, void
> *data);
Should this be called something else? E.g. set_technology or set_rat_mode.
> +};
> +
> diff --git a/src/ofono.h b/src/ofono.h
> index 379f413..ff67728 100644
> --- a/src/ofono.h
> +++ b/src/ofono.h
> @@ -113,6 +113,7 @@ enum ofono_atom_type {
> OFONO_ATOM_TYPES_CALL_VOLUME = 15,
> OFONO_ATOM_TYPE_GPRS = 16,
> OFONO_ATOM_TYPE_GPRS_CONTEXT = 17,
> + OFONO_ATOM_TYPE_RADIO_SETTINGS = 18,
> };
>
> enum ofono_atom_watch_condition {
> @@ -168,6 +169,7 @@ void __ofono_atom_free(struct ofono_atom *atom);
> #include <ofono/voicecall.h>
> #include <ofono/gprs.h>
> #include <ofono/gprs-context.h>
> +#include <ofono/radio-settings.h>
>
> #include <ofono/sim.h>
>
> diff --git a/src/radio-settings.c b/src/radio-settings.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..6e41194
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/src/radio-settings.c
<snip>
> +#define RADIO_SETTINGS_INTERFACE "org.ofono.RadioSettings"
> +#define RADIO_SETTINGS_INTERFACE "org.ofono.RadioSettings"
> +
Double define?
Otherwise it looks good to me.
Regards,
-Denis
_______________________________________________
ofono mailing list
ofono@ofono.org
http://lists.ofono.org/listinfo/ofono
