Hi Pekka, On 01/18/2011 03:32 PM, Pekka Pessi wrote: > Hi Denis, > > 2011/1/18 Denis Kenzior <denk...@gmail.com>: >> I think we can track the cached flag for conditional CFs independently >> from CFU. The question is really whether the networks allow us to >> modify conditional CFs when CFU is active. In my testing the answer is No. > > You can erase (##67#) or deactivate (#67#) them. >
So CFB active. Activate CFU Query CFB -> Inactive Deregister CFB -> OK Query CFB -> Inactive Register CFB -> Error Deactivate CFU Query CFB -> Inactive Correct? Jeez, who thought this stuff up. So my thinking is that we should: - Not update conditional cfs when cfu is active (whether via GetProperties or mmi) - only clear the conditional cache flag if a conditional operation is attempted and succeeds while cfu is active - Report conditional cfs as empty when CFU is active (and emit signals appropriately when cfu is activated / deactivated) - Don't bother running conditional cf queries via GetProperties if cfu is active Do you see any issues with this? I'm really trying to minimize the number of queries we have to do in the most common case (which is activating / deactivating cfu via settings) Regards, -Denis _______________________________________________ ofono mailing list ofono@ofono.org http://lists.ofono.org/listinfo/ofono
