Thanks Mike, that looks good. I'd agree with using this text - any
objections from anyone (especially OGB members)?
S.
On Feb 15, 2009, at 22:49, Mike Kupfer wrote:
> Okay, here's my proposal for revising Section 4.2, with change
> bars. The
> footnotes are explanatory and not part of the proposal.
>
> 4.2 Censures, Suspensions and Expulsions
>
> There may arise situations where the behavior of an individual
> community member violates the Community's norms.
>
> The Board will maintain an OGB Censure, Suspension and Expulsion
> Process dealing with the specifics of notification, mediation, fact
> finding and taking actions, such as censure, suspension of privileges
> and expulsion.
>
> A community member may only be expelled for behavior that has
> |
> previously resulted in suspension of privileges for that
> member[1]. |
> Expulsion of a member is subject to confirmation by a vote of
> the |
> Electorate Group. The Electorate Group may also revoke the
> prior |
> expulsion of a member. The threshold for approving or revoking
> an |
> expulsion is the same as the threshold for approving changes to
> the |
> Constitution[2][3]. |
>
> mike
>
>
> Footnotes:
> [1] This requirement is the same as the current Constitution.
> [2] Currently a simple majority as long as there is a quorum, as per
> Section 2.1.3 of the proposed Constitution.
> [3] My intent is that we not make "operational" activities harder
> than
> changes to the Constitution. I thought it would be better to
> explicitly tie the expulsion rules to the rules for Constitution
> changes, rather than repeat the text from Section 2.1.3 ("majority
> of the Electorate Group members participating in a quorate
> election").
