No objection here.
Simon Phipps wrote:
> Thanks Mike, that looks good. I'd agree with using this text - any
> objections from anyone (especially OGB members)?
>
> S.
>
> On Feb 15, 2009, at 22:49, Mike Kupfer wrote:
>
>> Okay, here's my proposal for revising Section 4.2, with change bars.
>> The
>> footnotes are explanatory and not part of the proposal.
>>
>> 4.2 Censures, Suspensions and Expulsions
>>
>> There may arise situations where the behavior of an individual
>> community member violates the Community's norms.
>>
>> The Board will maintain an OGB Censure, Suspension and Expulsion
>> Process dealing with the specifics of notification, mediation, fact
>> finding and taking actions, such as censure, suspension of privileges
>> and expulsion.
>>
>> A community member may only be expelled for behavior that
>> has |
>> previously resulted in suspension of privileges for that
>> member[1]. |
>> Expulsion of a member is subject to confirmation by a vote of
>> the |
>> Electorate Group. The Electorate Group may also revoke the
>> prior |
>> expulsion of a member. The threshold for approving or revoking
>> an |
>> expulsion is the same as the threshold for approving changes to
>> the |
>> Constitution[2][3]. |
>>
>> mike
>>
>>
>> Footnotes:
>> [1] This requirement is the same as the current Constitution.
>> [2] Currently a simple majority as long as there is a quorum, as per
>> Section 2.1.3 of the proposed Constitution.
>> [3] My intent is that we not make "operational" activities harder than
>> changes to the Constitution. I thought it would be better to
>> explicitly tie the expulsion rules to the rules for Constitution
>> changes, rather than repeat the text from Section 2.1.3 ("majority
>> of the Electorate Group members participating in a quorate
>> election").
>
> _______________________________________________
> ogb-discuss mailing list
> ogb-discuss at opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/ogb-discuss
--
stephen lau | stevel at opensolaris.org | www.whacked.net
