On Wed, 29 Apr 2009, Michelle Olson wrote: > On 04/29/09 14:41, Valerie Bubb Fenwick wrote: >> >> I don't know - what qualifies as "enough"? I heard back, positively, >> from several people, including some OGB members. Also, I spoke to you >> and John about it before I sent it, to get ideas for the original wording. >> >> So, is that enough? The only "negative" feedback I really got was "this >> still might not be enough" but nothing along the lines of "this is a >> waste of time" >> >>> the 13 folks who have joined the facilitation-discuss list (a number of >>> them might have feedback on this policy and how it is to be carried out). >>> If you think we have enough feedback already, then I think the next step >>> is to author a formal policy (2009/007) that incorporates any feedback >>> from the discussion thread and link to that draft from the agenda for >>> voting. >> >> So, do we have a place with all of our policies on it? I wasn't sure what >> number we were up to... > > We just have them on genunix, and 2009/001-2009/007 have been drafted, so go > for 2009/08. The main piece I want to understand is who will be the person to
Actually, I grabbed 2009/007 between when I asked and you sent this :-) I guess what has me confused is when I look at this page: http://opensolaris.org/os/community/ogb/policies/ It still has all of last years on there, which last years approval dates (I am pretty sure we renewed most of these, some with edits). Does someone have the AI to update this? Also, on the same page, 2009/005 & 2009/006 are not listed at all. does that mean they are no longer being considered? > exchange the email about voting with the new core contributor and how will > OGB be made aware of it. Is this between the Secretary and the CG > Facilitator? Is this between the new CC and the Facilitator? I don't know how > to vote on this policy until I understand who has to do the new work and how > it will be managed. Maybe it is just a communication between the Facilitator > and the new CCs prior to sending the request for a new CC to the Secretary? > Just need a bit more detail about what you think the process should be. As decided in yesterday's OGB meeting, and noted here to close the loop, this will be between the OGB and the facilitator. The secretary should wait to process the grants until the agreement from the new CCs is received. I will be the primary person making sure this is done, but if I am offline (on vacation, etc) than that role could be filled by any member of the OGB or the secretary. Facilitators can help speed this process by asking for this agreement from their new CCs before they submit their request to the OGB for processing. Hopefully this will be temporary. Valerie -- Valerie Fenwick, http://blogs.sun.com/bubbva Solaris Security Technologies, Developer, Sun Microsystems, Inc. 17 Network Circle, Menlo Park, CA, 94025.
