On 04/29/09 14:41, Valerie Bubb Fenwick wrote: > > I don't know - what qualifies as "enough"? I heard back, positively, > from several people, including some OGB members. Also, I spoke to you > and John about it before I sent it, to get ideas for the original > wording. > > So, is that enough? The only "negative" feedback I really got was "this > still might not be enough" but nothing along the lines of "this is a > waste of time" > >> the 13 folks who have joined the facilitation-discuss list (a number >> of them might have feedback on this policy and how it is to be >> carried out). If you think we have enough feedback already, then I >> think the next step is to author a formal policy (2009/007) that >> incorporates any feedback from the discussion thread and link to that >> draft from the agenda for voting. > > So, do we have a place with all of our policies on it? I wasn't sure what > number we were up to...
We just have them on genunix, and 2009/001-2009/007 have been drafted, so go for 2009/08. The main piece I want to understand is who will be the person to exchange the email about voting with the new core contributor and how will OGB be made aware of it. Is this between the Secretary and the CG Facilitator? Is this between the new CC and the Facilitator? I don't know how to vote on this policy until I understand who has to do the new work and how it will be managed. Maybe it is just a communication between the Facilitator and the new CCs prior to sending the request for a new CC to the Secretary? Just need a bit more detail about what you think the process should be. Thanks! Michelle
