On 17/04/2009, at 10:25 AM, Simon Phipps wrote: > Concerning strategy, I'm asserting that we have a very clear > priority to get the almost-finished constitution iterated & ratified > so the new work we do fits it. I'm unhappy that it's been pushed off > the agenda, onto a "priorities" discussion and with the implication > that the outcome of that discussion itself will get tested by a > future "poll" - effectively procedural cancellation of the > discussion. This is wasting time as well as wasting the work of the > previous Board, and I want to hear clearly from the OGB who it is > wants that waste and why.
As a former OGB member, I agree with Simon. We've made a lot of progress last year into creating a constitution that allowed people to get work done rather than struggle with the complexity of the current constitution. It would be a shame to lose that work. Glynn
