On 04/16/09 16:06, Simon Phipps wrote: > > I don't think that's true; Michelle, for example, wants us to pass a > policy statement saying we will only create amendments to the current > document,
The policy proposal is for board consideration, I do not care whether it passes or fails, I want only to know the result. > and she has also proposed a new project to enact part of that > constitution more precisely. By avoiding the discussion we are having > a decision made for us by default to discard the new draft, only make > amendments to the old document and delay revision until next year. No, the public vote puts us where we are today, nothing I have done. We will allow one month to assess this situation and then make a decision as a team and publish it May 1st. -M
