On 04/16/09 15:32, Glynn Foster wrote: > > On 17/04/2009, at 10:25 AM, Simon Phipps wrote: > >> Concerning strategy, I'm asserting that we have a very clear priority >> to get the almost-finished constitution iterated & ratified so the >> new work we do fits it. I'm unhappy that it's been pushed off the >> agenda, onto a "priorities" discussion and with the implication that >> the outcome of that discussion itself will get tested by a future >> "poll" - effectively procedural cancellation of the discussion. This >> is wasting time as well as wasting the work of the previous Board, >> and I want to hear clearly from the OGB who it is wants that waste >> and why. > > As a former OGB member, I agree with Simon. We've made a lot of > progress last year into creating a constitution that allowed people to > get work done rather than struggle with the complexity of the current > constitution. It would be a shame to lose that work.
We are on a path to resolve the strategy question by the end of this month. This is far from going on endlessly, it is merely giving us a reasonable chance at an informed decision. I'm confident that on May 1st we will have a decision about how to move forward. Regards, Michelle
