Keith M Wesolowski wrote: > Shouldn't there be some sort of deadline for each candidate to give > the Secretary an answer? Or should each of them be asked privately > (in parallel) and their answers collected, then the highest-ranked > accepting candidate be installed on 31 Jan or once it's known who that > will be, if sooner? What you have here doesn't seem guaranteed to > terminate.
I've contacted Jim offline - he's promised me an answer by this evening. If he doesn't want to join the OGB, I'll contact Ben. It could have been done in parallel, but no point in raising people's hopes further down the line unnecessarily ;) Glynn
