Glynn Foster wrote: > > Keith M Wesolowski wrote: >> Shouldn't there be some sort of deadline for each candidate to give >> the Secretary an answer? Or should each of them be asked privately >> (in parallel) and their answers collected, then the highest-ranked >> accepting candidate be installed on 31 Jan or once it's known who that >> will be, if sooner? What you have here doesn't seem guaranteed to >> terminate. > > I've contacted Jim offline - he's promised me an answer by this evening. If he > doesn't want to join the OGB, I'll contact Ben. It could have been done in > parallel, but no point in raising people's hopes further down the line > unnecessarily ;)
Jim passed due to a planned long vacation during this time. Ben has agreed to join the OGB, and I'll add him to ogb-private. He'll attend the conf call this week too. Glynn
