On Jan 22, 2008 10:06 AM, Shawn Walker <swalker at opensolaris.org> wrote: > On Jan 22, 2008 9:57 AM, Alan Coopersmith <alan.coopersmith at sun.com> wrote: > > Shawn Walker wrote: > > > However, there is currently no constitutional requirement for ARC or > > > any other process for code integration, nor to my knowledge, has the > > > OGB delegated any such power to make such a requirement to any of the > > > current communities. I am a subscriber to the external ARC mailing > > > list and often follow it with great interest. > > > > The OGB has placed no restrictions beyond that of the constitution on > > the processes communities choose to establish for code integration, and > > I see nothing there that prohibits them from choosing to require > > architectural > > review on their own. While I would still like to include ARC review > > in a set of common practices used by multiple communities, I don't think > > you can claim they have no power to do it on their own until then. > > > > I have not made any such claim. Indeed, as far as I know, each > Community Group is free to establish certain guidelines surrounding > contribution to their projects.
To clarify, what I was trying to say is that I don't believe the OGB has given the ability to delegate certain requirements for the whole OpenSolaris Community. I apologise for any confusion I may have created. Cheers, -- Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/ "To err is human -- and to blame it on a computer is even more so." - Robert Orben
