Teresa Giacomini wrote: > Aren't there some projects that might logically be owned by more than > one CG? For example, the Starter Kit project would make sense under the > Academic and Research Community, the Documentation community, the > Advocacy CG and possible more. Why force it to align with on CG?
I don't think any projects need to be owned by any Community Group. The projects are owned by the people contributing to them. While there are obvious benefits with coordinating across a set of special interest groups, it's entirely up to the participants of that project to do that. Glynn
