On Sun, 27 Jan 2008, Teresa Giacomini wrote: > Aren't there some projects that might logically be owned by more than > one CG? For example, the Starter Kit project would make sense under the > Academic and Research Community, the Documentation community, the > Advocacy CG and possible more. Why force it to align with on CG?
Frankly I think the starter kit is good, but the type of mentality that comes from a corporate world. Why can't people just go with their ideas and start creating stuff? Next thing we know, we'll have a checklist for forming a community, and that's a morbid thought to me...:-( -- Alan DuBoff - Solaris x86 IHV/OEM Group
