On Jan 27, 2008 5:02 PM, Alan DuBoff <alan.duboff at sun.com> wrote: > On Sun, 27 Jan 2008, Teresa Giacomini wrote: > > > Aren't there some projects that might logically be owned by more than > > one CG? For example, the Starter Kit project would make sense under the > > Academic and Research Community, the Documentation community, the > > Advocacy CG and possible more. Why force it to align with on CG? > > Frankly I think the starter kit is good, but the type of mentality that > comes from a corporate world. Why can't people just go with their ideas > and start creating stuff? > > Next thing we know, we'll have a checklist for forming a community, and > that's a morbid thought to me...:-(
Don't we already have a checklist? -- Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/ "To err is human -- and to blame it on a computer is even more so." - Robert Orben
