>Your view. I see it differently. The then-OGB voted prematurely, in >my absence, on the assumption I would in some way "block" something. >As others have stated, premature optimisation is the enemy of >excellence.
You're being revisionist. You know that that is not what happened and you know that your presence was neither required nor relevant for the outcome of that meeting. Are you now saying that we held the meeting knowing that you could not make it? It sure sounds like it. If history is repeating itself then it is in one party trying to delay the community from making any statements or decisions until the "fait accompli" is there. Casper
