>As I mentioned on website-discuss I'll make whatever changes are agreed 
>upon by the various projects involved (Indiana, Advocacy) along with any 
>(possible) OGB involvement. While I realize this is a controversial 
>issue and understand that 'rolling things back' might damper some the 
>frustration, I don't want to provide alternate designs until there is 
>clear agreement from all invested parties on the proposed changes.


So why did you make a change to the home page  and basically handed it
over to a single project?  That seems to be overstepping more bounds
than I can count.

Casper


Reply via email to