On 02/11/2007, Casper.Dik at sun.com <Casper.Dik at sun.com> wrote: > > >Again, you fail to define consensus. If you believe it to be the > >majority opinion, how are you determining that? Counting emails? If > >so, I respectfully suggest you have erred gravely. If you want to > >claim consensus; call a vote. To do otherwise is misrepresenting this > >community and makes me regret voting for the OGB members. > > > If you had read the constitution you would know how consensus is defined; > by the definition of the constitution there is consensus among OGB members > in this matter.
Then thank you for indicating that you were speaking about the OGB and not the community. Saying there's consensus without qualifying who the consensus is amongst doesn't mean much. -- Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/ "We don't have enough parallel universes to allow all uses of all junction types--in the absence of quantum computing the combinatorics are not in our favor..." --Larry Wall
