Alan Burlison wrote: > I know we currently have a situation where multiple Community Groups > (CGs) apparently "sponsor" a single Project, but the more I think about > the issues it has caused, and the more I read the Constitution, the more > problematic the practice seems to be. Here is a list of the reasons: > > <snipping the completely valid points for me to address later> > I would therefore propose that the ad-hoc practice of allowing multiple > CGs to "sponsor" a given Project be discontinued, as it has no clear > constitutional basis and it clearly causes far more problems than it > ever solves. > > It's not completely ad-hoc, it was part of the Project Instantiation Process document.
cheers, steve -- stephen lau | stevel at opensolaris.org | www.whacked.net
