Garrett D'Amore writes: > > But I don't think we ought to include o]r disinclude any particular > > solution based on who provides the infrastructure or on the history of > > how we got here. > > > > I agree with almost all of this, but I also think it is important that > OpenSolaris not be at the mercy of Sun. IOW, it should at least be > possible for the bug tracking system to moved into a datacenter other > than Sun's.
Right. One of the requirements (for that long list) is that the bug database itself -- not just the front-end _access_ to the database, but the raw contents -- are openly available for anyone who wants to set up his own copy. Just like the open source code management. > All this said, I really like how bugster deals with bugs (i.e. how the > data is stored and arranged in the databases.) On the other hand, I > hate the bugster UI. :-) It would be nice to have a web front end, too. I'll just refrain from commenting on bugster. I'm more interested in the requirements. -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking <james.d.carlson at sun.com> Sun Microsystems / 1 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677
