On 1/10/2008, at 3:11 AM, Jim Grisanzio wrote: > hey ... as we implement the new roles in the new site, the guys have > raised some questions I wanted to clarify. > > In the main roles/groups proposal the role "Participant" is specific > to > each Group it's associated with > http://www.genunix.org/wiki/index.php/OGB_2008/010. That's clear. > > However, in the Membership proposal we say that anyone who signs up to > the site is a Participant > http://wiki.genunix2.org/wiki/index.php/OGB_2008/010_membership. The > problem with that wording is that it can imply that anyone who signs > up > to the site is a Participant in all Groups, which obviously can't be > the > case. We should clarify this to mean that people who sign up to the > site > are registrants who are /eligible/ to be Participants in whatever > Group > they want to be part of (Project, UG, Community). Cool with that > change/clarification?
Sounds fine to me. > Also, regarding Contributors to Projects: we currently have it set > that > Contributors have rights to access all the code repositories of a > given > Project. However, we feel it's better to give the Leader the ability > to > assign access on a per-repository basis. This gives an extra level of > control. Cool with that change/clarification? All projects should have public repositories ideally - with everyone achieving read-only rights. Leaders should absolutely be the ones who decide whether an individual gets read/write rights. Glynn
