On 9/30/08 7:11 AM, Jim Grisanzio wrote: > hey ... as we implement the new roles in the new site, the guys have > raised some questions I wanted to clarify. > > In the main roles/groups proposal the role "Participant" is specific to > each Group it's associated with > http://www.genunix.org/wiki/index.php/OGB_2008/010. That's clear. > > However, in the Membership proposal we say that anyone who signs up to > the site is a Participant > http://wiki.genunix2.org/wiki/index.php/OGB_2008/010_membership. The > problem with that wording is that it can imply that anyone who signs up > to the site is a Participant in all Groups, which obviously can't be the > case. We should clarify this to mean that people who sign up to the site > are registrants who are /eligible/ to be Participants in whatever Group > they want to be part of (Project, UG, Community). Cool with that > change/clarification? > That sounds fine with me; that's the assumption I've had anyway, and hadn't thought of that interpretation until you raised it just now. > Also, regarding Contributors to Projects: we currently have it set that > Contributors have rights to access all the code repositories of a given > Project. However, we feel it's better to give the Leader the ability to > assign access on a per-repository basis. This gives an extra level of > control. Cool with that change/clarification? > Yup; perhaps rephrase it as: You must be a Contributor to said Project in order to apply for rights to commit to its repositories. This is, after all, the current model we've got implemented in the existing infrastructure.
cheers, steve -- stephen lau | stevel at opensolaris.org | www.whacked.net
