On 1/10/2008, at 9:02 PM, Jim Grisanzio wrote: > On 10/01/08 04:24, Glynn Foster wrote: >> >> All projects should have public repositories ideally - with >> everyone achieving read-only rights. Leaders should absolutely be >> the ones who decide whether an individual gets read/write rights. >> > > Agree. That's how we have it set up in the new app. But I'm asking > if we want to go another level and give leaders the ability to > assign rights on a per-repository basis. So, you and I are > contributors in a project, and you get access to x-repo and I get > access to y-repo. Is that necessary or desired? Or should all > contributors in a project have access to all repositories in that > project?
Per repository seems absolutely fair to me. Glynn
