> I plan to participat, I just want to make sure that whatever decision > that we all reach is "doable". IE: I don't want to have us come to an > agreement, and then have it rejected for some unforeseen internal Sun > reason. >
As I said before, I took this conversation internal and discussed things with branding and TM legal. I feel I have a fairly good idea of what would and what wouldn't be approved. Keeping in mind of course that Sun's interest in protecting this TM is in the best interests, not opposing, to the community. > You say there are only Sun employees. However, a Corporation is a > legal entity of it's own regard. Although any employee of a company > can be considered a representative of the company, many of you have > gone to great pains to say there is no Sun only as humans. Push comes > to shove, a decision of this potential magnitude has to be signed off > by legal and or someone who has has the authority. (Possibly B. Lee?) > I officially assign myself as Sun delegate (or community liaison or whatever) for this decision-making process. I will run it around and get buy-off from the TM owners, Sun. Or bring back feedback for us to work with. > I want to make sure that the people sitting in the room have the > authority to shape/represent Sun's Trademark policies. > > Cheers, > -Brian > > P.S. - That all said, I am going to throw out some talking points on > the advocacy list. > >> ____ >> [*] although that lack of decisions may actually be part of a >> bigger problem, but I most certainly digress... >> >> >> > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/ogb-discuss/attachments/20071020/51ac9fcd/attachment.html>
