On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 01:32:27PM -0700, Garrett D'Amore wrote: > I think Richlowe had the idea, that closed _inception_ should be > permissible. > > A final open commitment should be required. > > I've also suggested that the "closed" reviews should not meant that they > were held "internal" to any contributor, but rather that only the > OpenSolaris ARC members and the case owners were part of the review, and > that the case materials are locked up (only accessible to ARC members, > case owners, and maybe interns.) Note that these ARC members could be > employees of Sun, Joyent, or Microsoft for all I care. That shouldn't > matter. > > [Stuff about the need for NDAs for ARC members removed.]
> Further, the final (open) commitment review can be held without > requiring all the discussion that occurred during inception to be open, > I think. It might be wasteful, since some concerns dispensed with earlier are likely to resurface. But still, sounds like a good compromise to me. Nico --
