On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 04:09:37PM -0700, Garrett D'Amore wrote: > All good points. Maybe we just allow the time-honored tradition to > continue. But then what is the point of doing an inception review?
That's the best argument for allowing closed inceptions: that if not then projects that want them will get informal ones. In practice, however, there'd have to be very few such projects, because ARC members are busy folk.
