Brad Thompson wrote: > Be patient. It isn't like this is Ryan's or the R&D staff's first priority. > This is just a pet project, after all. We are being patient, no one's actually _complaining_. It's just that the NDAs should have been here by now based on what we were told (since he wanted to send out SRDs late last week or early this week) and we haven't had a status report. Mostly I think people are just skittish of being accidently left out of the loop (at least I am) so they're looking for reassurance that nothing's happening for _anybody_. -Damian
- [ogf-d20-l] Ping? J. Michael Looney
- Re: [ogf-d20-l] Ping? Damian Smart
- Re: [ogf-d20-l] Ping? Clark Peterson
- RE: [ogf-d20-l] Ping? Brad Thompson
- RE: [ogf-d20-l] Ping? J. Michael Looney
- Re: [ogf-d20-l] Ping? Damian Smart
- Re: [ogf-d20-l] Ping? J. Michael Looney
- [ogf-d20-l] D20 supers...some clas... Lizard
- [ogf-d20-l] RE: [off-d20-l] D2... Brad Thompson
- Re: [ogf-d20-l] Ping? Lizard
- Re: [ogf-d20-l] Ping? RCFKen
- [ogf-d20-l] Ping? J. Michael Looney
- Re: [ogf-d20-l] Ping? John Nephew
- Re: [ogf-d20-l] Ping? lizard
- [ogf-d20-l] Guidelines for d20 software korath
- Re: [ogf-d20-l] Ping? FrogGod
