> Ryan S. Dancey > > > Shifting back to D20 software here, again, do you mean games or _all_ > > software. > > The proposed "Product Identity Document" would be 99% non-game > content. The > 1% OGL content could be used by anyone. Why couldn't the software, or a portion of it, be OGC? -Brad
- RE: [ogf-d20-l] D20 System T... Martin L. Shoemaker
- Re: [ogf-d20-l] D20 System T... lizard
- RE: [ogf-d20-l] D20 System Trademark License issues Brad Thompson
- Re: [ogf-d20-l] D20 System Trademark License issues J. Michael Looney
- Re: [ogf-d20-l] D20 System Trademark License issu... Ryan S. Dancey
- Re: [ogf-d20-l] D20 System Trademark License ... J. Michael Looney
- Re: [ogf-d20-l] D20 System Trademark Lice... Ryan S. Dancey
- Re: [ogf-d20-l] D20 System Trademark ... J. Michael Looney
- Re: [ogf-d20-l] D20 System Trade... Ryan S. Dancey
- Re: [ogf-d20-l] D20 System T... J. Michael Looney
- RE: [ogf-d20-l] D20 System Trademark ... Brad Thompson
- RE: [ogf-d20-l] D20 System Trademark License ... Lynn Fredricks
- RE: [ogf-d20-l] D20 System Trademark License issu... Brad Thompson
- [ogf-d20-l] The web, the license, and everything.... lizard
- Re: [ogf-d20-l] The web, the license, and eve... Ryan S. Dancey
- Re: [ogf-d20-l] D20 System Trademark License issues Faustus von Goethe
- Re: [ogf-d20-l] D20 System Trademark License issu... J. Michael Looney
- [ogf-d20-l] Another Trademark question lizard
- Re: [ogf-d20-l] Another Trademark questio... Ryan S. Dancey
- Re: [ogf-d20-l] Another Trademark questio... Doug Meerschaert
