"Martin L. Shoemaker" wrote: > > And let me just say that the way you have treated fairly and honorably with > these early risk-takers OUGHT TO put to rest most of the conspiracy theories > and "Evil Wizards Scheme" rumors out there. It won't, but it ought to. One of the things you will find is that, once someone has decided something, evidence to the contrary rarely sways them. For example, "Wizard is just waiting until they can do maximum damage to the hobby!" or "Sure, Ryan's a great guy, but some suit at Hasbro will pull the plug as part of a complex scheme to destroy roleplaying!" I know there's a game here....
- Re: [ogf-d20-l] Update to the D20 STL Ryan S. Dancey
- Re: [ogf-d20-l] Update to the D20 STL John Nephew
- [ogf-d20-l] Can 'd20' be severed from 'D20 System'? Brad Thompson
- RE: [ogf-d20-l] Can 'd20' be severed from 'D20 Sy... Martin L. Shoemaker
- Re: [ogf-d20-l] Can 'd20' be severed from 'D20 Sy... Ryan S. Dancey
- RE: [ogf-d20-l] Can 'd20' be severed from 'D2... Brad Thompson
- [ogf-d20-l] Feedback on New Draft John Nephew
- Re: [ogf-d20-l] Feedback on New Draft Ryan S. Dancey
- RE: [ogf-d20-l] Feedback on New Draft Martin L. Shoemaker
- Re: [ogf-d20-l] Feedback on New Draft Larry D. Hols
- Re: [ogf-d20-l] Feedback on New Draft Mac Golden
- Re: [ogf-d20-l] Feedback on New Draft Ryan S. Dancey
- Re: [ogf-d20-l] Feedback on New Draft Mac Golden
- [ogf-d20-l] Version 1.0 comments Mac Golden
- RE: [ogf-d20-l] Update to the D20 STL FrogGod
- Re: [ogf-d20-l] Update to the D20 STL lizard
- Re: [ogf-d20-l] Update to the D20 STL Ryan S. Dancey
