It's also worth nothing that, and I believe I'm quoting correctly here, that
the OGL was stated to be based upon the GNU model of an open licence.

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ryan S.
Dancey
Sent: 04 January 2001 04:46
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ogf-d20-l] D20 & Shareware


> No, it most definitely is NOT.  You're concentrating solely on the
> Debian/GNU definition of Open Source, which was the first, but is no
longer
> the only open source license out there by a long shot.

I'm sorry, but calling a spade a heart doesn't make it a heart.  The term
Open Source has a widespread and very specific definition, and that
defintion is more extensive than just a requirement for the distribution of
source code along with executable code.

Ryan



Reply via email to