On Thu, 22 Jan 2004 12:14:02 -0500 Bryant Durrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Let me be contrary: no, this is NOT the place for such a debate. > > I would say the place for that debate is the forums on > > www.fixgama.org. > > I'm not sure this is the place for the debate, but I am also sure > that fixgama.org is also not the place for the debate. > Fixgama.org is a Website that makes, as a starting point, the > assumption that GAMA needs fixing. If you want to debate that > specific point, I'd have to say that there are better places to > do it.
When Ryan last brought up these proposals, he did it on a bunch of other industry mailing lists and in public fora on a number of different websites. And a bunch of people complained about the bandwidth chewed up by discussion of things not necessarily germane to those lists, and to the difficulty of following the debate when it was spread out over a half-dozen different places. By putting up this website, Ryan's at least attempting to deal with those two problems. Spike Y Jones _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
