<<The second type would be content type #3
that I listed above.
>>
That would not be, definitionally, part of the "work covered by the license".
<<By my reasoning, the license would not include the following clause
if the whole work were considered OGL just by applying the license
to the work. To put it another way, "Why do you have to clearly
indicate which portions of the work are OGC if the whole work is
considered to be OGC just by putting it with the license?"
>>
Because you have to define for the end user what the "work covered by the license" is. Consider that if you apply it to a magazine article you must make it clear that it is the article covered, not the magazine. You do that by signalling to the end user what the OGC and PI is, and that's the "work covered by the license".
Lee
_______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list Ogf-l@mail.opengamingfoundation.org http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
