>From: Kal Lin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>On Thu, 11 May 2000, Faustus von Goethe wrote:
>
> > Ok Kal - I seem to have (somewhere) miscommunicated to you ...
> >

[Kal Said]
>I did not say you desired to infringe  ...
>I said distinguish and differentiate.  The word advantage does
>not appear ...
>If that is your assessment then fine.  You are more of an expert
>on your desires than me ...
>Furthermore, in a previously posting, you state ...
>As one member of the community, I think I should voice my objections...
>What exactly do you mean by ...
>to keep asking someone else to do it or let you associate with
>their trademark is absurd...
>I do not see any problem with WotC getting more sales/profit ...
>You should be aware not everyone subscribes to your definitions ...
>McDonalds HAS made a big contribution to the economy...

Whatever.


[FAUST SAID]
> > At this point (as I said before) I want one (and only one) thing.  A
> > definitive way to let my customers know which of the products I am 
>selling
> > will work with D&D, and which of them will not.

More than one person on this list has understood this statement perfectly 
and responded with valid and cordial suggestions.  Kal, I cannot understand 
why you are having such a problem with this.  So far, we have the following 
suggestions.  I can:

1. Spend my money to create my own "compatible" trademark.
2. Work with the community to develop such a mark that does not infringe on 
WotC's.
3. Ask WotC to create such a mark.
4. Use a "compatibility wheel" showing percentage.
5. Use words somewhat like "Designed for a classic fantasy setting."
6. Use the phrase "100% d20 compatible." rather than D&D.

Nobody at this point is discussion using "Works with D&D", except you.

Rather than attacking me - can you contribute?  How about your opinion on 
the ramifications of each of the above proposals?

Faust
________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com

-------------
For more information, please link to www.opengamingfoundation.org

Reply via email to