On Thu, 25 May 2000, Walter Christensen wrote:
> Example:
> Let's say you produce a MUD engine that uses the d20SRD as its base with no
> modifications. In this case you would produce a document containing just
> the d20SRD, since that is the entirety of the OGL work you used. If you had
> used the d20SRD and added a new class, then you would produce a document
> that contained the d20SRD as well as a write-up of the new class.
Are you assuming the new class now becomes OGL content?
If yes, then does classes added by print producers become
OGL content? If no, then how does this contribute anything
to the OGL community.
> Notes:
> I'm not sure that this is what Brad is proposing, though this is what I read
> into his proposal. Regardless, I think this satisfies the spirit of the OGL
> while still allowing software developers control of their code.
That's what I read, too. Thanks for a good example to
illustrate some more issues.
Cheers,
--Kal
-------------
For more information, please link to www.opengamingfoundation.org
